广东工业大学学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 121-125.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7162.2014.01.024

• 综合研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

斯特林发动机回热器性能研究

麦志豪,邹城,陈观生,李凤,张仁元   

  1. 广东工业大学 材料与能源学院,广东 广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:2013-02-05 出版日期:2014-03-29 发布日期:2014-03-29
  • 作者简介:麦志豪(1988-),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为热能工程换热过程及设备.
  • 基金资助:

    广东工业大学重大项目培育专项基金资助项目(092006)

Performance Study of Heat Regenerators of Stirling Engines

Mai Zhi-hao, Zou Cheng, Chen Guan-sheng,Li Feng,Zhang Ren-yuan   

  1. School of Materials and Energy, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • Received:2013-02-05 Online:2014-03-29 Published:2014-03-29

摘要: 对不同材料及孔隙率的斯特林发动机回热器的性能进行了多循环模拟分析和实验研究.研究的回热器填充材料有泡沫铜与不锈钢丝网,材料孔隙率分别为75%、85%以及复合型孔隙率,回热器长径比为2∶1及3∶1,研究结果显示:不锈钢回热器的热容量较大,而泡沫铜回热器的启动速度和换热速度较快;75%孔隙率回热器换热量较大,而85%孔隙率回热器温度场收敛速度更快;长径比2∶1回热器压损较小,而3∶1回热器的换热量较大.经实验研究分析,实验数据与模拟结果偏差约为5%,可为斯特林发动机回热器的设计提供依据.

关键词: 斯特林发动机;回热器;多孔介质

Abstract: The performance of Sterling engine regenerators was simulated and experimentally researched. The filling materials were foamed copper and stainless steel wire mesh, whose porosity was 75% or 85% respectively, and the ratio of length to diameter was 2:1 or 3:1. Research results show that: the heat capacity of stainless steel heat exchanger is larger, and the startup speed of foamed copper heat exchanger is faster; Heat transfer of 75% porosity regenerator is larger, while the temperature convergence speed of 85% porosity regenerator is faster; Pressure loss of 2:1 regenerator is smaller, while the 3:1 regenerator exchanger heat is larger. The experimental study indicates that the experimental data is in good agreement with simulation results with a 5% margin of error, so it can provide some reference for the design of regenerators.

Key words: Sterling engine; heat regenerator; porous medium

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!