广东工业大学学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 12-16.
摘要: 由于高阶振型的影响,用Pushover方法进行高层钢结构性能分析仍存在很多问题.采用不同的水平加载模式对多层和高层钢框架结构进行多遇和罕遇地震作用下的Pushover分析,得到了结构顶点位移、楼层位移和层间位移角等结果,并对结构的抗震性能进行了多方面的评估,对如何选取更合理的加载模式用于高层钢结构的性能分析做了一定的探索工作.
[1]Krawinkle H,Seneviratna GDPK.Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation[J].Engineefing Structures,1998,20(4-6):452464.[2]Onoufriou T,Forbes V J.Developments in structural system reliability assessments of fixed steel offshore platforms[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2001,71:189-199.[3]中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB50011—2001,建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.[4]Onoufriou T.Overview of advanced structural and reliability techniques for optimum design of fixed offshore platforms[J].Journal of Construction Steel Research,1998,44(3):181-201.[5]Mehdi Poursha.A Consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings[J].Engineering Structures,2009,31:591-599.[6]Stewart G,Van de Graaf JW.A methodology for platform collapse analysis[C]∥Proceedings of the Ofshore Technology Conference.Paper OTC 63 1 1,Houston,1 990.[7]Federal Emerfency Management Agency(FEMA).NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Building Seismic Safety Council[R].FEMA Report 273,1997.[8]Eberhard M O,Sozen M.Behavior.based method to determine design shear in earthquake-resistant walls[J].Journal of StmcturaJ Division,ASCE,1993,119(2):619-640.[9]北京金土木软件有限公司.SAP2000中文版使用指南[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2004. |
No related articles found! |
|