Journal of Guangdong University of Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (06): 75-87.doi: 10.12052/gdutxb.230123

• Catalytic and Energy Materials • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Chemical Regulation of Microenvironment in Metal-organic Frameworks for Lithium-sulfur Batteries

Weng Jing-qia, Zhang Qi, Huang Shao-ming   

  1. School of Materials and Energy, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • Received:2023-08-31 Online:2023-11-25 Published:2023-11-08

Abstract: Lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs) are considered to be one of the most promising new generation energy storage device owing to the high theoretical specific capacity, low cost, and environmental friendliness of sulfur. However, there are still some unsolved critical issues in LSBs, such as slow redox kinetics, shuttle effect caused by dissolution and diffusion of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs), as well as volume changes in electrodes during charge/discharge processes. which result in poor capacity and cycling stability, severely hinder the practical application of LSBs. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have highly tunable pore microenvironment, and their chemical adsorption and catalytic abilities towards guest molecules, such as polysulfides, can be precisely controlled at the molecular level by regulating the metal centers/clusters and organic ligands. Therefore, applying MOFs to LSBs can effectively capture, block and accelerate the catalytic conversion of polysulfides, thus inhibiting the shuttle effect and improving the electrochemical performance of LSBs. This review summarizes various high performance interlayer materials, cathode materials and multifunctional separator materials based on MOFs developed by regulating the pore microenvironment of MOFs, and analyzes the mechanism of regulating MOFs’ microenvironment affecting the performance of LSBs. Finally, the problem and development direction of MOFs materials applicable to high performance LSBs are proposed.

Key words: lithium-sulfur batteries, metal-organic framework, microenvironment, shuttle effect

CLC Number: 

  • TM911
[1] WU M M, ZHOU Z, et al. Covalent organic frameworks as electrode materials for rechargeable metal-ion batteries [J]. Interdisciplinary Materials, 2023, 2(2): 231-259.
[2] CHAYAMBUKA K, MULDER G, DANILOV D L, et al. From li-ion batteries toward Na-ion chemistries: challenges and opportunities [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2020, 10(38): 2001310.
[3] XIAO Y B, GONG W, GUO S J, et al. Regulating coordination environment in metal-organic frameworks for adsorption and redox conversion of polysulfides in lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. ACS Materials Letters, 2021, 3(12): 1684-1694.
[4] MENG R J, DU Q J, ZHONG N, et al. A tandem electrocatalysis of sulfur reduction by bimetal 2D MOFs [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2021, 11(47): 2102819.
[5] ZENG Q H, LI X, GONG W, et al. Copolymerization of sulfur chains with vinyl functionalized metal-organic framework for accelerating redox kinetics in lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2022, 12(21): 2104074.
[6] LIANG J, SUN Z H, LI F, et al. Carbon materials for Li-S batteries: Functional evolution and performance improvement [J]. Energy Storage Materials, 2016, 2: 76-106.
[7] DU M, LI Q, ZHANG G, et al. Metal-organic framework-based sulfur-loaded materials [J]. Energy & Environmental Materials, 2022, 5(1): 215-230.
[8] NI L B, ZHAO G J, YANG G, et al. Dual core-shell-structured S@ C@ MnO2 nanocomposite for highly stable lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(40): 34793-34803.
[9] LEI T Y, CHEN W, HUANG J, et al. Multi-functional layered WS2 nanosheets for enhancing the performance of lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2017, 7(4): 1601843.
[10] ZHENG Y, ZHENG S S, XUE H G, et al. Metal-organic frameworks for lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2019, 7(8): 3469-3491.
[11] GENG P, WANG L, DU M, et al. MIL-96-Al for Li-S batteries: shape or size? [J]. Advanced Materials, 2022, 34(4): 2107836.
[12] ZHOU M, J LI Y Y, LEI T Y, et al. Ion-inserted metal-organic frameworks accelerate the mass transfer kinetics in lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Small, 2021, 17(44): 2104367.
[13] CAPKOVÁ D, KAZDA T, ČECH O, et al. Influence of metal-organic framework MOF-76 (Gd) activation/carbonization on the cycle performance stability in Li-S battery [J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 51: 104419.
[14] WANG Z Q, HUANG W Y, HUA J C, et al. An anionic-MOF-based bifunctional separator for regulating lithium deposition and suppressing polysulfides shuttle in Li-S batteries [J]. Small Methods, 2020, 4(7): 2000082.
[15] ZHANG L, HOU Y L. The rise and development of MOF-based materials for metal-chalcogen batteries: current status, challenges, and prospects[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2023, 13(20): 2204378.
[16] QI C, XU L, WANG J, et al. Titanium-containing metal-organic framework modified separator for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2020, 8(34): 12968-12975.
[17] BAI S Y, LIU X Z, ZHU K, et al. Metal-organic framework-based separator for lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Nature Energy, 2016, 1(7): 1-6.
[18] MANTHIRAM A, FU Y Z, SU Y S. Challenges and prospects of lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2013, 46(5): 1125-1134.
[19] MANTHIRAM A, FU Y Z, CHUNG S H, et al. Rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114(23): 11751-11787.
[20] WANG D W, ZENG Q C, ZHOU G M, et al. Carbon-sulfur composites for Li-S batteries: status and prospects [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2013, 1(33): 9382-9394.
[21] FANG R P, ZHAO S Y, SUN Z H, et al. More reliable lithium-sulfur batteries: status, solutions and prospects [J]. Advanced Materials, 2017, 29(48): 1606823.
[22] YAGHI O M, LI H L. Hydrothermal synthesis of a metal-organic framework containing large rectangular channels [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1995, 117(41): 10401-10402.
[23] GUO S J, XIAO Y B, WANG J, et al. Ordered structure of interlayer constructed with metal-organic frameworks improves the performance of lithium-sulfur batteries[J]. Nano Research, 2021, 14(12): 4556-4562.
[24] TIAN M, PEI F, YAO M S, et al. Ultrathin MOF nanosheet assembled highly oriented microporous membrane as an interlayer for lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Energy Storage Materials, 2019, 21: 14-21.
[25] HONG X J, SONG C L, YANG Y, et al. Cerium based metal-organic frameworks as an efficient separator coating catalyzing the conversion of polysulfides for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. ACS Nano, 2019, 13(2): 1923-1931.
[26] ZHOU J W, LI R, FAN X X, et al. Rational design of a metal-organic framework host for sulfur storage in fast, long-cycle Li-S batteries [J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2014, 7(8): 2715-2724.
[27] YANG D W, LIANG Z F, TANG P Y, et al. A high conductivity 1d π-d conjugated metal-organic framework with efficient polysulfide trapping-diffusion-catalysis in lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Advanced Materials, 2022, 34(10): 2108835.
[28] HAN D D, WANG Z Y, PAN G L, et al. Metal-organic-framework-based gel polymer electrolyte with immobilized anions to stabilize a lithium anode for a quasi-solid-state lithium-sulfur battery [J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(20): 18427-18435.
[29] CHIOCHAN P, YU X, SAWANGPHRUK M, et al. A metal organic framework derived solid electrolyte for lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2020, 10(27): 2001285.
[30] LIU B, TAHERI M, TORRES J F, et al. Janus conductive/insulating microporous ion-sieving membranes for stable Li-S batteries [J]. ACS Nano, 2020, 14(10): 13852-13864.
[31] LI L, LUO Y, WANG Y, et al. Rational design of a well-aligned metal-organic framework nanopillar array for superior lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 454: 140043.
[32] WANG X, WANG Y, WU F, et al. Continuous zirconium-based MOF-808 membranes for polysulfide shuttle suppression in lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Applied Surface Science, 2022, 596: 153628.
[33] SU Y, WANG W, WANG W, et al. Cerium-based MOF as a separator coating for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2022, 169(3): 030528.
[34] ZHU Z, ZENG Y, PEI Z, et al. Bimetal-organic framework nanoboxes enable accelerated redox kinetics and polysulfide trapping for lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Angewandte Chemie, 2023, 135(31): e202305828.
[35] RANA M, AL-FAYAAD H A, LUO B, et al. Oriented nanoporous MOFs to mitigate polysulfides migration in lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Nano Energy, 2020, 75: 105009.
[36] LI X, ZHANG X, XU Y, et al. Metallic and dimensional optimization of metal-organic frameworks for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries[J]. Chemistry: A European Journal, 2023, 29(31): e202300407.
[37] CAPKOVÁ D, ALMÁŠI M, KAZDA T, et al. Metal-organic framework MIL-101 (Fe) -NH2 as an efficient host for sulphur storage in long-cycle Li-S batteries [J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2020, 354: 136640.
[38] LI Y, LIN S, WANG D, et al. Single atom array mimic on ultrathin MOF nanosheets boosts the safety and life of lithium–sulfur batteries [J]. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32(8): 1906722.
[39] LEE D H, AHN J H, PARK M S, et al. Metal-organic framework/carbon nanotube-coated polyethylene separator for improving the cycling performance of lithium-sulfur cells [J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2018, 283: 1291-1299.
[40] LI J, JIAO C M, ZHU J H, et al. Hybrid co-based MOF nanoboxes/CNFs interlayer as microreactors for polysulfides-trapping in lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2021, 57: 469-476.
[41] SUNG S H, KIM B H, LEE S T, et al. Increasing sulfur utilization in lithium-sulfur batteries by a Co-MOF-74@ MWCNT interlayer [J]. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2021, 60: 186-193.
[42] XIAO Y B, XIANG Y C, GUO S J, et al. An ultralight electroconductive metal-organic framework membrane for multistep catalytic conversion and molecular sieving in lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Energy Storage Materials, 2022, 51: 882-889.
[43] FENG P, HOU W, BAI Z, et al. Ultrathin two-dimensional bimetal NiCo-based MOF nanosheets as ultralight interlayer in lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2023, 34(4): 107427.
[44] GUO S J, XIAO Y B, CHEREVAN A, et al. Catalytic multivariable metal-organic frameworks for lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Materials Today, 2023, 65: 37-46.
[45] DANG B Y, GAO D Y, LUO Y H, et al. Bifunctional design of cerium-based metal-organic framework-808 membrane modified separator for polysulfide shuttling and dendrite growth inhibition in lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 52: 104981.
[46] ZHENG J M, TIAN J, WU D X, et al. Lewis acid-base interactions between polysulfides and metal organic framework in lithium sulfur batteries [J]. Nano Letters, 2014, 14(5): 2345-2352.
[47] LI P R, MA L, WU T P, et al. Chemical immobilization and conversion of active polysulfides directly by copper current collector: a new approach to enabling stable room-temperature Li-S and Na-S batteries [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(22): 1800624.
[48] GENG P B, DU M, GUO X T, et al. Bimetallic metal-organic framework with high-adsorption capacity toward lithium polysulfides for lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Energy & Environmental Materials, 2022, 5(2): 599-607.
[49] LI W T, GUO X T, GENG P B, et al. Rational design and general synthesis of multimetallic metal-organic framework nano-octahedra for enhanced Li-S battery [J]. Advanced Materials, 2021, 33(45): 2105163.
[50] ZENG Q H, XU L L, LI G X, et al. Integrating sub-nano catalysts into metal-organic framework toward pore-confined polysulfides conversion in lithium-sulfur batteries[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2023, 33(43): 2304619.
[51] CAI D, LU M J, LI L, et al. A highly conductive MOF of graphene analogue Ni3 (HITP)2 as a sulfur host for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Small, 2019, 15(44): 1902605.
[52] BAO W Z, ZHANG Z A, QU Y H, et al. Confine sulfur in mesoporous metal-organic framework@ reduced graphene oxide for lithium sulfur battery [J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2014, 582: 334-340.
[53] HOU Y P, MAO H Z, XU L Q. et al. MIL-100 (V) and MIL-100 (V) /rGO with various valence states of vanadium ions as sulfur cathode hosts for lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Nano Research, 2017, 10: 344-353.
[54] ZHANG H, ZHAO W Q, ZOU M C, et al. 3D, mutually embedded MOF@ carbon nanotube hybrid networks for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(19): 1800013.
[55] JIANG H Q, LIU X C, WU Y S, et al. Metal-organic frameworks for high charge-discharge rates in lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(15): 3916-3921.
[56] GENG P B, CAO S, GUO X T, et al. Polypyrrole coated hollow metal-organic framework composites for lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2019, 7(33): 19465-19470.
[57] BAI S Y, ZHU K, WU S C, et al. A long-life lithium-sulphur battery by integrating zinc-organic framework based separator [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2016, 4(43): 16812-16817.
[1] Wang Xin-ying, Chen Li, Zhang Jia-cheng, Yu Yao-jiang, Wang Yi, Li Yun-yong. Preparation of Vanadium-based Sulfide-MXene Hetero-Catalysts and Comparative Study of Catalytic Mechanism of Lithium-sulfur Batteries [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2024, 41(03): 18-28.
[2] Cao Yi-ting, Wang Qiao, Xu Ze-tao, Lyu Guan-heng. Research Progress of MOF/Bismuth-based Semiconductor Composites in Photocatalytic Technology [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2022, 39(04): 113-120.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!