广东工业大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (01): 115-122.doi: 10.12052/gdutxb.210065
蔡云楠1, 何志文1, 梁锐1,2
Cai Yun-nan1, He Zhi-wen1, Liang Rui1,2
摘要: 棕地开发与再利用是城市土地供给的重要途径。当前, 棕地规模大、治理对象难以识别、修复标准相对单一、规划体系与生态修复脱节、公众认知与参与不足等是其治理和再利用过程中最主要的问题。本文以棕地再利用为出发点, 结合棕地影响阈值, 明确人体健康指标, 分类确定棕地再利用标准。采取应对多种情景的风险回避、全生命周期的损失控制、多利益群体的风险转移、多种技术的风险承担等措施, 从规划对象、修复标准、规划内容与流程、管理体系、工作机制等方面入手, 提出基于风险管控的棕地治理和再利用规划的建议。
中图分类号:
[1] 赵菲菲, 许月卿, 李艳华. 棕地再开发国内外比较研究[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2014(3): 14-18. ZHAO F F, XU Y Q, LI Y H. Comparison study on brownfield redevelopment at home and abroad [J]. Territory & Natural Resources Study, 2014(3): 14-18. [2] SMITH R J. Love canal reviewed [J]. Science, 1980, 210(4469): 513. [3] CAO K, GUAN H. Brownfield redevelopment toward sustainable urban land use in China [J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2007, 17(2): 127-134. [4] TADESSE B, DONALDSON J D, GRIMES S M. Contaminated and polluted land: a general review of decontamination management and control [J]. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 2010, 60(3): 227-240. [5] U. S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works. Comprehensive environmental response, compensation, and liability Act (CERCLA) section 120 interagency agreements[EB/OL]. (2005-06-16)[2021-04-26]. https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/fedfac/comprehensive-environmental-response-compensation-and-liability-act-cercla-section-120_.html. [6] 宋飏, 林慧颖, 王士君. 国外棕地再利用的经验与启示[J]. 世界地理研究, 2015(3): 65-74. SONG Y, LIN H Y, WANG S J. International experience of brownfield reuse and its enlightenment [J]. World Regional Studies, 2015(3): 65-74. [7] Department for Communities and Local Government. Planning policy statement 3: housing[A]. London:DCLG.2006. [8] 王玲, 姚南. 国外棕地修复与再开发经验对成都的启示[J]. 四川建筑, 2019, 39(6): 19-20. [9] Federation of Canadian Municipalities. Brownfields[R]. Ottawa Ontario: Federation of Canadian Municipalities, 2009: 1. [10] Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan. Current status of the brownfield issue in Japan, interim report [EB/OL]. (2009-8-15) [2021-04-26]. https://www.env.go.jp/en/water/soil/brownfields/interin-rep0703. [11] 生态环境部. 污染场地术语: HJ682-2014[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2014: 1-3. [12] 国务院. 土壤污染防治行动计划(国发(2016)31号)[A/OL]. (2016-05-31)[2021-04-26]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-05/31/content_5078377.htm. [13] 住房和城乡建设部, 生态环境部. 全国城市生态保护与建设规划(2015-2020年)[A/OL]. (2016-12-06)[2021-04-26]. http://www.caep.org.cn/sy/sswhbgh/sywwrjp_22031/201812/W020181227588849790425.pdf. [14] 生态环境部, 工业和信息化部, 国土资源部, 住房和城乡建设部. 关于保障工业企业场地再开发利用环境安全的通知 [A/OL]. (2012-11-27) [2021-04-26]. [15] 国家统计局城市社会经济调查司. 中国城市建设统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2017: 1-23. [16] 张琳, 李影, 严良政, 等. 我国工业土地再利用的环境风险及对策[J]. 环境保护, 2012(15): 45-47. [17] 李仲华. 试述土壤污染对人类健康的侵害[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2009, 34(7): 192-194. LI Z H. Discusses the soil pollution infringement in human health[J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2009, 34(7): 192-194. [18] CHENG F, GEERTMAN S, KUFFER M, et al. An integrative methodology to improve brownfield redevelopment planning in Chinese cities: a case study of Futian, Shenzhen [J]. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 2011, 35(5): 388-398. [19] 王晓丽. 工业棕地治理析论[J]. 经济与社会发展, 2014, 12(1): 66-69. [20] 郭鹏, 梁燕华, 苏海棠. 美国棕地治理分析及其对我国的启示[J]. 环境保护科学, 2010, 36(3): 73-76. GUO P, LIANG Y H, SU H T. Analysis of American brownfields cleanup and its revelationof China [J]. Environmental Protection Science, 2010, 36(3): 73-76. [21] 蔡云楠, 刘琛义. 生态城市建设的环境绩效评估探索[J]. 南方建筑, 2015(1): 97-101. CAI Y N, LIU C Y. Environmental performance assessment of Eco-city [J]. South Architecture, 2015(1): 97-101. [22] 游志斌. 美国国土安全风险管理的主要经验及启示[J]. 中国应急管理, 2011(4): 46-51. [23] SWARTJES F A. Human health risk assessment related to contaminated land: state of the art [J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2015, 37(4): 651-673. [24] DELLARCO M, BANGS G. Update of the U. S. EPA guidelines for exposure assessment [J]. Epidemiology, 2006, 17(6): S61. [25] 国家环境保护总局. 土壤环境监测技术规范: HJ/T166-2004[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2005: 10-11. [26] 冯俊生, 张俏晨. 土壤原位修复技术研究与应用进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014(11): 1861-1867. FENG J S, ZHANG Q C. A review on the study on practice of soil remediation in situ [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2014(11): 1861-1867. [27] 唐秋萍, 张毅, 王伟. 工业废弃场地健康风险评价[J]. 环境保护科学, 2010,36(4): 62-64. TANG Q P, ZHANG Y, WANG W. Health risk assessment for industrial enterprises brownfield [J]. Environmental Protection Science, 2010,36(4): 62-64. [28] 王国庆, 骆永明, 宋静, 等. 土壤环境质量指导值与标准研究Ⅰ. 国际动态及中国的修订考虑[J]. 土壤学报, 2005(4): 666-673. WANG G Q, LOU Y M, SONG J, et al. Study on soil environmental quality guidelines and standards Ⅰ . International trend and suggestions for amendment in China [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2005(4): 666-673. [29] 宋静, 陈梦舫, 骆永明, 等. 制订我国污染场地土壤风险筛选值的几点建议[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2011, 23(3): 26-33. SONG J, CHEN M F, LUO Y M, et al. Suggestion on derivation of soil screening values and remediation goals for contaminated sites in China [J]. The Administration and Technique of Environmental Monitoring, 2011, 23(3): 26-33. [30] 蔡云楠, 朱志军, 郭冠颂, 等. 生态城市规划的理念与实践——以广州海珠生态城为例[J]. 南方建筑, 2014(6): 88-94. CAI Y N, ZHU Z J, GUO G S, et al. The idea and practice of Guangzhou Haizhu Eco-city planning [J]. South Architecture, 2014(6): 88-94. [31] 蔡云楠, 温钊鹏. “海绵城市”视角下绿色基础设施体系构建与规划策略[J]. 规划师, 2016, 32(12): 12-18. CAI Y N, WEN Z P. Green infrastructure system planning strategy for‘Sponge City’ development [J]. Planners, 2016, 32(12): 12-18. [32] NIJKAMP P, RODRNBURG C A, WAGTENDONK A J. Success factors for sustainable urbanbrownfield development: a comparative case study approach to polluted sites [J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 40(2): 235-252. |
[1] | 周星汝, 吴斌, 马世发. 粤港澳大湾区三生功能识别及耦合协调度诊断[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2022, 39(04): 73-82. |
[2] | 庄雪芳, 陈健, 陈艺文, 陈构超. 国土空间体系背景下基于GIS的村庄规划数据库建设研究[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2022, 39(01): 123-128. |
|