粤港澳大湾区三生功能识别及耦合协调度诊断

doi:10.12052/gdutxb.210115

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 识别国土空间三生功能(生产、生态与生活)状态并诊断其耦合协调度是国土空间规划调控的重要依据之一。以自然资源部2020年版Globeland30最新数据产品为基础，采用地表覆盖分类与三生功能映射法，结合国内生产总值、常住人口规模和生态服务价值3个综合性当量对粤港澳大湾区33个标准地域单元进行了三生功能评价与耦合协调度诊断。结果表明：大湾区生产功能指数位于0.347~0.969，生产功能较高的单元主要位于大湾区核心地带，特别是香港、深圳、东莞、广州南部、佛山东部、中山、珠海和澳门沿线区域；生活功能指数位于0.342~0.974，其整体与生产功能格局相似，但排名存在位序差异，说明各个单元的国内生产总值和常住人口规模并不完全正相关；生态功能指数位于0.306~0.952，基本呈现出与生产和生活功能截然相反的空间格局，但香港例外。从三生功能累积指数来看，大湾区整体并未呈现出从湾区核心向外围逐步衰减的趋势，低值区出现在核心圈层与边远圈层之间；从三生功能耦合协调度诊断来看，大湾区没有不协调单元，其中15个单元基本协调，17个单元中度协调，而高度协调发展的只有中国香港。从国土空间三生功能协调发展视角分析了大湾区的三生功能以及耦合协调度等多个指数，诊断结果可为大湾区发展实施精细化调控提供相关依据。

关键词: 三生功能, 耦合协调, 国土空间规划, 粤港澳大湾区

Abstract: Identifying the production, living and ecological functions of territorial space and diagnosing their coupling and coordination degree is one of the important scientific bases for the implementation of precise policy of territorial spatial planning. Based on the latest Globeland 30_2020 land cover data provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources of China, space to functions mapping method was adopted to evaluate the initial production, living and ecological functions. Then the gross domestic product (GDP), permanent population size (PRP) and ecological service value (ESV) were used to modify the production, living and ecological functions respectively. A total of 33 standard geographical units of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) were identified and diagnosed, and the results showed that: the production function index of GBA ranged from 0.347 to 0.969. The units with higher production functions were mainly located in the core area of GBA, especially in the regions along the routes of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Dongguan, southern Guangzhou, eastern Foshan, Zhongshan, Zhuhai and Macao. The index of living functions ranged from 0.342 to 0.974, which was similar to the pattern of production functions on the whole, but there were slight differences in the specific ranking, indicating that the GDP of each unit was not positively correlated with the size of PRP. The ecological function index was between 0.306 and 0.952, which basically showed a spatial pattern completely opposite to the production and living functions, but there were some exceptions such as Hong Kong. From the perspective of cumulative index, the overall production-living-ecological functions of GBA does not gradually decline from the core circle to the periphery circle of GBA, the low value area appears in the middle circle. Coupling and coordination degree diagnosis shows that there are no disharmonious units in GBA, 15 units in basic coordination and 17 units in moderate coordination. However, among all of them, only Hong Kong has a highly coordinated development. From the perspective of coordinated development of production, living and ecological functions in territorial space, the diagnostic results can be used in implementing precise policies like "one city, one policy" for GBA to achieve high quality and high level of development.

Key words: production-living-ecological functions, coupling coordination, territorial spatial planning, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA)

中图分类号:

TU982

周星汝, 吴斌, 马世发. 粤港澳大湾区三生功能识别及耦合协调度诊断[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2022, 39(04): 73-82.

Zhou Xing-ru, Wu Bin, Ma Shi-fa. Identification of Production-Living-Ecological Functions and Diagnosis of their Coupling Coordination Degree in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2022, 39(04): 73-82.

参考文献

[1] 董祚继. 新时代国土空间规划的十大关系[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(9): 1589-1599.
DONG Z J. Ten relations of territorial planning in the new era [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(9): 1589-1599.
[2] 江东, 林刚, 付晶莹. “三生空间”统筹的科学基础与优化途径探析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(5): 1085-1101.
JIANG D, LIN G, FU J Y. Discussion on scientific foundation and approach for the overall optimization of "production-living-ecological" space [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(5): 1085-1101.
[3] 段亚明, 许月卿, 黄安, 等. “生产-生活-生态”功能评价研究进展与展望[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(2): 113-124.
DUAN Y M, XU Y Q, HUANG A, et al. Progress and prospects of "production-living-ecological" functions evaluation [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2021, 26(2): 113-124.
[4] 黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇. 面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 378-391.
HUANG J C, LIN H X, QI X X. A literature review on optimization of spatial development pattern based on ecological-production-living space [J]. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(3): 378-391.
[5] 李广东, 方创琳. 城市生态-生产-生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(1): 49-65.
LI G D, FANG C L. Quantitative function identification and analysis of urban ecological-production-living spaces [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(1): 49-65.
[6] 念沛豪, 蔡玉梅, 谢秀珍, 等. 基于生态位理论的湖南省国土空间综合功能分区[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(9): 1958-1968.
NIAN P H, CAI Y M, XIE X Z, et al. Geographical space comprehensive function zoning in Hunan Province based on niche theory [J]. Resources Science, 2014, 36(9): 1958-1968.
[7] 周浩, 金平, 夏卫生. 省级国土空间“三生”功能评价及其分区研究——以河南省为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(8): 10-17.
ZHOU H, JIN P, XIA W S. Functional zoning of territorial space in provincial level based on the production-living-ecological functions: a case of Henan Province [J]. China Land Science, 2020, 34(8): 10-17.
[8] 魏小芳, 赵宇鸾, 李秀彬, 等. 基于“三生功能”的长江上游城市群国土空间特征及其优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(5): 1070-1079.
WEI X F, ZHAO Y L, LI X B, et al. Characteristics and optimization of geographical space in urban agglomeration in the upper reaches of the Yangtze river based on the function of "production-living-ecological" [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(5): 1070-1079.
[9] 张红旗, 许尔琪, 朱会义. 中国“三生用地”分类及其空间格局[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(7): 1332-1338.
ZHANG H Q, XU E Q, ZHU H Y. An ecological-living-industrial land classification system and its spatial distribution in China [J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(7): 1332-1338.
[10] 于莉, 宋安安, 郑宇, 等. “三生用地”分类及其空间格局分析——以昌黎县为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017, 38(2): 89-96.
YU L, SONG A A, ZHENG Y, et al. The ecological-living-industrial land classification system and the analysis of its spatial distribution: case of Changli county [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2017, 38(2): 89-96.
[11] 程婷, 赵荣, 梁勇. 国土“三生空间”分类及其功能评价[J]. 遥感信息, 2018, 33(2): 114-121.
CHENG T, ZHAO R, LIANG Y. Production-living-ecological space classification and its functional evaluation [J]. Remote Sensing Information, 2018, 33(2): 114-121.
[12] 刘继来, 刘彦随, 李裕瑞. 中国“三生空间”分类评价与时空格局分析[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7): 1290-1304.
LIU J L, LIU Y S, LI Y R. Classification evaluation and spatial-temporal analysis of "production-living-ecological" spaces in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(7): 1290-1304.
[13] 刘海龙, 王跃飞, 谢亚林, 等. 太原城市群三生空间时空演变特征及功能[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(5): 310-318.
LIU H L, WANG Y F, XIE Y L, et al. Characteristics and functions of spatiotemporal evolution of production-living-ecological space in Taiyuan urban agglomeration region [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 40(5): 310-318.
[14] 邹艳, 张绍良, 谢译诣, 等. 徐州市三生空间分布格局与时空演化特征分析[J]. 测绘科学, 2020, 45(7): 154-162.
ZOU Y, ZHANG S L, XIE Y Y, et al. Spatial distribution and evolution characters of production-living-ecological spaces in Xuzhou city [J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2020, 45(7): 154-162.
[15] 金星星, 陆玉麒, 林金煌, 等. 闽三角城市群生产-生活-生态时空格局演化与功能测度[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(12): 4286-4295.
JIN X X, LU Y Q, LIN J H, et al. Research on the evolution of spatiotemporal patterns of production-living-ecological space in an urban agglomeration in the Fujian Delta region [J]. China Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(12): 4286-4295.
[16] 冀正欣, 刘超, 许月卿, 等. 基于土地利用功能测度的“三生”空间识别与优化调控[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(18): 222-231.
JI Z X, LIU C, XU Y Q, et al. Identification and optimal regulation of the production-living-ecological space based on quantitative land use functions [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(18): 222-231.
[17] 李欣, 方斌, 殷如梦, 等. 江苏省县域“三生”功能时空变化及协同/权衡关系[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(11): 2363-2377.
LI X, FANG B, YIN R M, et al. Spatial-temporal change and collaboration/trade-off relationship of "production-living-ecological" functions in county area of Jiangsu province [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(11): 2363-2377.
[18] 王成, 唐宁. 重庆市乡村三生空间功能耦合协调的时空特征与格局演化[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(6): 1100-1114.
WANG C, TANG N. Spatio-temporal characteristics and evolution of rural production-living-ecological space function coupling coordination in Chongqing Municipality [J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(6): 1100-1114.
[19] 唐常春, 李亚平, 杜也, 等. 1980—2018年粤港澳大湾区国土空间结构演变[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(4): 928-944.
TANG C C, LI Y P, DU Y, et al. The evolution of territorial spatial structure of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area from 1980 to 2018 [J]. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(4): 928-944.
[20] 尹振南, 周廷刚, 李洪忠, 等. 粤港澳大湾区不透水面变化及城市扩展研究[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2021, 37(2): 106-113.
YIN Z N, ZHOU T G, LI H Z, et al. Study on impervious surface change and urban expansion of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2021, 37(2): 106-113.
[21] 马世发, 马梅, 蔡玉梅, 等. 面向国土规划的空间评价标准地域单元划分[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2015, 34(3): 112-117.
MA S F, MA M, CAI Y M, et al. Nomenclature of units for territorial spatial planning [J]. Areal Research and Development, 2015, 34(3): 112-117.
[22] XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHEN L M, et al. Dynamic changes in the value of China's ecosystem services [J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017(26): 146-154.
[23] 单薇, 金晓斌, 冉娜, 等. 江苏省土地利用“生产-生活-生态”功能变化与耦合特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(7): 1541-1551.
SHAN W, JIN X B, RAN N, et al. "Production-living-ecological" function evaluation and coupling coordination analysis of land use in Jiangsu province [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(7): 1541-1551.
[24] 姜磊, 柏玲, 吴玉鸣. 中国省域经济、资源与环境协调分析——兼论三系统耦合公式及其扩展形式[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(5): 788-799.
JIANG L, BAI L, WU Y M. Coupling and coordinating degrees of provincial economy, resources and environment in China [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(5): 788-799.
[25] LI J S, SUN W, LI M Y, et al. Coupling coordination degree of production, living and ecological spaces and its influencing factors in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 298: 126803.
[26] YANG Y, BAO W, LIU Y. Coupling coordination analysis of rural production-living-ecological space in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 117: 106512.
[27] 姚士谋, 陆大道, 王聪, 等. 中国城镇化需要综合性的科学思维——探索适应中国国情的城镇化方式[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(11): 1947-1955.
YAO S M, LU D D, WANG C, et al. Urbanization in China needs comprehensive scientific thinking: exploration of the urbanization mode adapted to the special situation of China [J]. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(11): 1947-1955.
[28] 念沛豪, 蔡玉梅, 马世发, 等. 国土空间综合分区研究综述[J]. 中国土地科学, 2014, 28(1): 20-25.
NIAN P H, CAI Y M, MA S F, et al. Review of spatial comprehensive zoning in China [J]. China Land Sciences, 2014, 28(1): 20-25.
[29] 金贵, 邓祥征, 张倩, 等. 武汉城市圈国土空间综合功能分区[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 541-552.
JIN G, DENG X Z, ZHANG Q, et al. Comprehensive function zoning of national land space for Wuhan metropolitan region [J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 541-552.
[30] 马毅, 谢嘉宬, 施斯, 等. 基于地域功能理论的市县国土空间功能分区研究[J]. 规划师, 2020, 36(18): 57-64.
MA Y, XIE J C, SHI S, et al. City and county level land and space functional zoning based on regional function theory [J]. Planners, 2020, 36(18): 57-64.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed