广东工业大学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (04): 100-104.doi: 10.12052/gdutxb.170156

• 综合研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于国六标准的ORVR加油排放试验研究

谢火志1, 熊锐1, 吴坚1,2, 胡德卿1, 潘浩坤1   

  1. 1. 广东工业大学 机电工程学院, 广东 广州 510006;
    2. 广汽集团 汽车工程研究院, 广东 广州 510640
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-27 出版日期:2018-07-09 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 作者简介:谢火志(1993-),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为汽车节能与排放控制.
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技厅省部产学研结合基金资助项目（2013B090400002）

An Experimental Study of ORVR Refueling Emission Based on China VI Standard

Xie Huo-zhi1, Xiong Rui1, Wu Jian1,2, Hu De-qing1, Pan Hao-kun1   

  1. 1. School of Electromechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China;
    2. Automobile Engineering Research Institute, Guangzhou Automobile Group, Guangzhou 510640, China
  • Received:2017-11-27 Online:2018-07-09 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:
     

HTML

PDF (PC)

3231

摘要： 对某满足国六排放限值的车载油气回收系统（ORVR）用美国OPW加油枪和德国ZVA加油枪分别进行加油排放试验，并采集加油过程通气管流量、回气管流量、油箱压强和炭罐增重量的数据.结果表明，ZVA加油枪加油时的通气管流量、回气管流量、油箱压强和炭罐增重量均比OPW加油枪加油时的小，在国六燃油系统开发过程中，调整回气管限流阀孔径和对炭罐脱附进行标定时应考虑不同加油枪的影响.

关键词: 车载油气回收系统, 加油枪, 燃油系统, 回气管, 炭罐

Abstract: An on-board refueling vapor recovery (ORVR) system that meets the emission limits of China VI regulation is tested with three refueling emission experiments respectively with OPW refueling gun and ZVA refueling gun, and data of flow of air pipe, flow of circulation pipe, tank pressure and canister weight increments are collected. The results show that the flow of air pipe, flow of circulation pipe, tank pressure and canister weight increments of ZVA refueling gun are less than those of OPW refueling gun when refueling. In the China VI fuel system development process, while adjusting the aperture of flow-limiting valve on circulation pipe as well as calibrating the canister purge, the effect of different refueling guns should be considered.

Key words: onboard refueling vapor recovery (ORVR), refueling gun, fuel system, circulation pipe, canister

中图分类号: 

  • U467.3
[1] 郑育英, 邓淑华, 黄慧民, 等. 汽车尾气净化催化剂的研究进展[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2004, 21(3):28-33.ZHENG Y Y, DENG S H, HANG H M, et al. Research and development of automobile exhaust purifying catalyst[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2004, 21(3):28-33.
[2] LIU H, MAN H, TSCHANTZ M, et al. VOC from vehicular evaporation emissions:status and control strategy[J]. Environmental Science Technology, 2015, 49(24):14424-14431.
[3] 曾恩山,熊锐,吴坚, 等. 车用催化剂的台架快速老化研究[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2016, 33(6):49-52.ZENG E S, XIONG R, WU J, et al. A study of rapid aging of automotive catalyst on the bench[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2016, 33(6):49-52.
[4] WANG Z H, YAN F W, TIAN S P, et al. The development of manual transmission shift performance test bench[C]//International Conference on Electric Information and Control Engineering.[S.l.]:IEEE, 2011:825-828.
[5] YANG X, LIU H, CUI H, et al. Vehicular volatile organic compounds losses due to refueling and diurnal process in China:2010-2050[J]. Environmental Science Technology, 2015, 33(7):88-96.
[6] 中华人民共和国国家环境保护部.轻型汽车污染物排放限值及测量方法(中国第六阶段):GB18352.6-2016[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国国家环境保护部, 2016.
[7] 蔡锦榕, 何仁, 韦海燕. 控制轿车加油排放的ORVR技术综述[J]. 车用发动机, 2009,(2):1-5.CAI J R, HE R, WEI H Y. Review of the ORVR technology of controlling car refueling emission[J]. Vehicle Engine, 2009,(2):1-5.
[8] 王昊, 曾贤勇, 彭麟骅, 等. 车载加油蒸气回收系统技术研究[J]. 汽车技术, 2016,(12):55-58.WANG H, ZENG X Y, PENG L H, et al. Technical research on onboard refueling vapor recovery system[J]. Automobile Technology, 2016,(12):55-58.
[9] 付铁强, 戴春蓓, 仲崇智, 等. 不同脱附工况下加油排放的试验研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2017, 39(7):796-801+806.FU T Q, DAI C B, ZHONG C Z, et al. An experimental study on refueling emissions with different purge conditions[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2017, 39(7):796-801+806.
[10] 杜建波, 方茂东, 陆红雨, 等. 加油排放试验程序的设计和车载油气回收系统开发的建议[J]. 汽车工程, 2014, 36(5):537-541.DU J B, FANG M D, LU H Y, et al. Design of refueling emission test procedures and suggestions on the development of onboard refueling vapor recovery system[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2014, 36(5):537-541.
[11] REDDY S. Mathematical models for predicting vehicle refueling vapor generation[J]. SAE Paper 2010-01-1279.
[12] BUSCARIOLO F, MAGAZONI F, VOLPE L, et al. Multiphase fuel filling simulation methodology to evaluate different filler neck designs[J]. SAE Paper 2015-36-0297.
[13] 陈家庆, 张男, 王金惠, 等. 机动车加油过程中气液两相流动特性的CFD数值模拟[J]. 环境科学, 2011, 32(12):3710-3716.CHEN J Q, ZHANG N, WANG J H, et al. CFD numerical simulation onto the gas-liquid twophase flow behavior during vehicle refueling process[J]. Environmental Science, 2011, 32(12):3710-3716.
[14] 汪智, 何仁. 基于Fluent仿真的ORVR加油管液封设计[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 28(2):16-21.WANG Z, HE R. Design of liquid seal filler pipe of the onboard refueling vapor recovery system based on Fluent simulation[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Natural Science), 2014, 28(2):16-21.
[15] 何仁, 丁浩. 车载加油油气回收装置加油特性试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30(9):142-150.HE R, DING H. Refueling experiment of on-board refueling vapor recovery[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(9):142-150.
[16] 任碧琪, 常耀卿, 刘明宇, 等. 北京加油站加油速率与车载油气回收系统的兼容性[J]. 环境工程, 2015, 33(S1):487-490.REN B Q, CHANG Y Q, LIU M Y, et al. Compatibility between fuel dispensing rate and on-board refueling vapor recovery system in Beijing service station[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2015, 33(S1):487-490.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2017 《广东工业大学学报》编辑部
地址：广州市东风东路729号广东工业大学 邮编：510090
电话：020-37626653,020-37626139,020-37626396
邮箱：xbzrb@gdut.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发