广东工业大学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (01): 39-49.doi: 10.12052/gdutxb.220125

• • 上一篇    下一篇

企业数字化创新的驱动力:CIO政治技能与议题营销的影响机制研究

张延林, 邓福祥, 唐洪婷, 吴学雁   

  1. 广东工业大学 管理学院,广东 广州 510520
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-28 出版日期:2023-01-25 发布日期:2023-01-12
  • 通信作者: 吴学雁(1980-),女,讲师,博士,主要研究方向为社会化商务管理、知识挖掘,E-mail:wxy_gdut@163.com
  • 作者简介:张延林(1974-),男,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为数字化创新、IT战略管理
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(72101060,72272039)

Enhancing Digital Innovation: the Effects of CIO Political Skill and the Mediating Role of Issue Selling

Zhang Yan-lin, Deng Fu-xiang, Tang Hong-ting, Wu Xue-yan   

  1. School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
  • Received:2022-07-28 Online:2023-01-25 Published:2023-01-12

摘要: 尽管首席信息官(Chief Information Officer,CIO)肩负着主导数字化创新的重要职责,但依靠传统的结构权力和专家作用难以应对其中涉及的组织变革的挑战。基于政治技能和议题营销理论,本文探讨CIO利用政治技能推动企业数字化创新的作用机理,对218份CIO-业务高管配对问卷进行实证分析。结果表明:CIO政治技能正向影响CIO议题营销能力,进而正向影响企业数字化创新;CIO议题营销能力完全中介了CIO政治技能对企业数字化创新的正向影响;业务高管的社会行为整合正向调节了CIO议题营销能力与企业数字化创新的关系。据此,提出了企业数字化创新的驱动力模型,即CIO政治技能和议题营销能力是CIO主导数字化创新的驱动力,CIO议题营销能力和业务高管社会行为整合分别发挥着中介效应和调节效应。该模型弥补了现有研究关于CIO如何在组织内有效推动企业数字化创新的缺口,并为企业数字化创新实践提供参考。

关键词: 数字化创新, 首席信息官, 政治技能, 议题营销, 社会行为整合

Abstract: Although the Chief Information Officers (CIOs) have the important responsibility for digital innovation in their organizations, it is difficult for them to meet the challenges of the organizational changes involved in relying on traditional structural power and expert roles. Drawing on political skill and issue selling theory, a study is conducted to explore how CIOs can use political skills to drive digital innovation. A theoretical model is presented and empirically tested using survey data collected from a sample of 218 matched pairs of CIOs and top business executives through multilevel regression analysis. The results suggest that: CIO political skill positively affects CIO issue selling effectiveness, which in turn positively affects enterprises digital innovation. CIO issue selling effectiveness fully mediates the positive effect of CIO political skills on enterprises digital innovation. Socio-behavioral integration between business executives positively moderates the relationship between CIO issue selling effectiveness and digital innovation. Accordingly, it is concluded that CIO political skills and issue selling effectiveness are enablers for digital innovation, and that CIO issue selling effectiveness and business executive socio-behavioral integration play a mediating and moderating effect, respectively. The research model proposed and empirically tested in this study bridges the research gap in CIOs effectively driving enterprises' digital innovation and can then provide some practical guidance.

Key words: digital innovation, Chief Information Officer(CIO), political skill, issue selling, socio-behavioral integration

中图分类号: 

  • C931.6
[1] 张延林, 邓福祥, 唐洪婷. CIO自身技能、需求方领导力与数字化创新[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(11): 145-156.
ZHANG Y L, DENG F X, TANG H T. Effects of CIO skills and demand-side leadership on digital innovation [J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(11): 145-156.
[2] CHEN D Q, ZHANG Y, XIAO J, et al. Making digital innovation happen: a chief information officer issue selling perspective [J]. Information Systems Research, 2021, 32(3): 987-1008.
[3] CHEN D Q, ZHANG Y, XIE K, et al. Shaping an innovative information system strategy: a CIO issue selling perspective[C]//International Conference on Information Systems 2017. Seoul: Association for Information Systems, 2017: 1-14.
[4] SINGH A, HESS T. How chief digital officers promote the digital transformation of their companies [J]. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2017, 16(1): 1-17.
[5] 白海青, 成瑾, 毛基业. CEO如何支持CIO?——基于结构性权力视角的多案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2014(7): 107-118.
BAI H Q, CHENG J, MAO J Y. How does CEO support CIO?—A multi-case study based on a structural power perspective [J]. Management World, 2014(7): 107-118.
[6] JONES M C, KAPPELMAN L, PAVUR R, et al. Pathways to being CIO: the role of background revisited [J]. Information & Management, 2020, 57(5): 103234.
[7] BANKER R D, HU N, PAVLOU P A, et al. CIO reporting structure, strategic positioning, and firm performance [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2011, 32(2): 487-504.
[8] GONZALEZ P A, ASHWORTH L, MCKEEN J. The CIO stereotype: content, bias, and impact [J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2019, 28(1): 83-99.
[9] HININGS B, GEGENHUBER T, GREENWOOD R. Digital innovation and transformation: an institutional perspective [J]. Information and Organization, 2018, 28(1): 52-61.
[10] LOKUGE S, SEDERA D, GROVER V, et al. Organizational readiness for digital innovation: development and empirical calibration of a construct [J]. Information & Management, 2019, 56(3): 445-461.
[11] TUMBAS S, BERENTE N, BROCKE J V. Digital innovation and institutional entrepreneurship: chief digital officer perspectives of their emerging role [J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2018, 33(3): 188-202.
[12] STEIBER A, ALÄNGE S, GHOSH S, et al. Digital transformation of industrial firms: an innovation diffusion perspective [J]. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2020, 24(3): 799-819.
[13] MINTZBERG H. The organization as political arena [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 1985, 22(2): 133-154.
[14] PFEFFER J. Power play [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2010, 88(7/8): 84-92.
[15] EWEN C, WIHLER A, BLICKLE G, et al. Further specification of the leader political skill–leadership effectiveness relationships: transformational and transactional leader behavior as mediators [J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2013, 24(4): 516-533.
[16] GEROW J E, GROVER V, THATCHER J B. Can political skill enhance business and IT knowledge? [J]. Information Systems Management, 2017, 34(2): 157-171.
[17] FERRIS G R, TREADWAY D C, KOLODINSKY R W, et al. Development and validation of the political skill inventory [J]. Journal of Management, 2005, 31(1): 126-152.
[18] DUTTON J E, ASHFORD S J. Selling issues to top management [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1993, 18(3): 397-428.
[19] CHEN M J, LIN H C, MICHEL J G. Navigating in a hypercompetitive environment: the roles of action aggressiveness and TMT integration [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(13): 1410-1430.
[20] PFEFFER J. Power in organizations[M]. Boston: Pitman Ballinger Pub Co, 1981.
[21] VAN DE VEN A H. Running in packs to develop knowledge-intensive technologies [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2005, 29(2): 365-377.
[22] FERRIS G R, ELLEN III B P, MCALLISTER C P, et al. Reorganizing organizational politics research: a review of the literature and identification of future research directions [J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2019, 6: 299-323.
[23] BROUER R L, CHIU C C, WANG L. Political skill dimensions and transformational leadership in China [J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2016, 6(31): 1040-1056.
[24] DUTTON J E, ASHFORD S J, ONEILL R M, et al. Reading the wind: how middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(5): 407-423.
[25] HOWARD-GRENVILLE J A. Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: issue selling as resourcing [J]. Organization Science, 2007, 18(4): 560-577.
[26] ASHFORD S J, ROTHBARD N P, PIDERIT S K, et al. Out on a limb: the role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43(1): 23-57.
[27] ALT E, CRAIG J B. Selling issues with solutions: igniting social entrepreneurship in for-profit organizations [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2016, 53(5): 794-820.
[28] ENNS H G, HUFF S L, HIGGINS C A. CIO lateral influence behaviors: gaining peers' commitment to strategic information systems [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2003, 27(1): 155-176.
[29] 张延林, 王丽, 谢康, 等. 信息技术和实体经济深度融合: 中国情境的拼创机制[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020(11): 80-98.
ZHANG Y L, WANG L, XIE K, et al. Integrating information technology and the real economy: a bricolage perspective in the Chinese context [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2020(11): 80-98.
[30] KARAHANNA E, PRESTON D S. The effect of social capital of the relationship between the CIO and top management team on firm performance [J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2013, 30(1): 15-56.
[31] VIAL G. Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda [J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2019, 28(2): 118-144.
[32] OCASIO W, LAAMANEN T, VAARA E. Communication and attention dynamics: an attention-based view of strategic change [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(1): 155-167.
[33] 邓春平, 宋琦, 毛基业, 等. 发起与感知: 协同创新中议题营销的作用[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(12): 95-110.
DENG C P, SONG Q, MAO J Y, et al. Initiation and perception: the role of issue selling in collaborative innovation [J]. Management World, 2018, 34(12): 95-110.
[34] SVAHN F, MATHIASSEN L, LINDGREN R. Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: how volvo cars managed competing concerns [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 239-253.
[35] NAMBISAN S, LYYTINEN K, MAJCHRZAK A, et al. Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 223-238.
[36] ZHANG Y, LI H. Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: the role of ties with service intermediaries [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(1): 88-109.
[37] FRANK K A, MAROULIS S J, DUONG M Q, et al. What would it take to change an inference? Using Rubin's causal model to interpret the robustness of causal inferences [J]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2013, 35(4): 437-460.
[1] 杜松华, 罗子婵, 陈扬森. 基于社会网络分析与反事实方法的价值共创研究——以小米虚拟社区为例[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2020, 37(02): 11-21.
[2] 何炜俊, 周应堂. 结合强弱联系和兴趣的社交网络推荐算法[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2019, 36(03): 39-46.
[3] 杜松华, 蒋瑞新, 朱琳. 企业微信影响力及服务质量研究:以物流企业为例[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2019, 36(01): 29-34,50.
[4] 杜松华, 柯晓波, 易虎, 胡少如. 技术依赖与社会构建视角下的社交媒体竞争力研究综述[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2017, 34(04): 1-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!