广东工业大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (06): 114-122.doi: 10.12052/gdutxb.210031

• 综合研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

广东省新型研发机构绩效评价研究——基于DEA模型的效率分析

范明明1, 刘贻新2, 杨诗炜1, 张光宇1   

  1. 1. 广东工业大学 管理学院, 广东 广州 510520;
    2. 广东工贸职业技术学院, 广东 广州 510510
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-23 出版日期:2022-11-10 发布日期:2022-11-25
  • 通信作者: 刘贻新(1976-),男,研究员,硕士生导师,主要研究方向为颠覆性创新、可持续转型和新型研发机构,E-mail:21412531@qq.com
  • 作者简介:范明明(1993-),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为技术创新与管理、新型研发机构
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(72074056,71874037);广东省软科学科技管理改革重点项目(2018B070714019);广东省自然科学基金资助项目(2018A030313397)

Research on Performance Evaluation of New R&D Institutions in Guangdong Province Efficiency Analysis Based on DEA Model

Fan Ming-ming1, Liu Yi-xin2, Yang Shi-wei1, Zhang Guang-yu1   

  1. 1. School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China;
    2. Guangdong Polytechnic of Industry and Commerce, Guangzhou 510510, China
  • Received:2021-02-23 Online:2022-11-10 Published:2022-11-25

摘要: 基于政府管理视角和机构自身发展视角,构建广东省新型研发机构绩效评价指标体系,并采用数据包络分析(Data Envelopment Analysis,DEA)方法对广东省新型研发机构进行绩效评价。研究发现,不同地区、不同属性以及不同研发类型的新型研发机构在投入产出效率上具有显著差异。并在研究结果基础上提出相应对策建议,为后续管理和高质量发展提供理论支持与实践指导。

关键词: 新型研发机构, 数据包络分析, 绩效评价

Abstract: Based on the perspective of government management and the development of institutions themselves, this paper constructs the evaluation index system of new R&D institutions in Guangdong Province, and evaluates the performance of new R&D institutions in Guangdong Province by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method, It is found that there are significant differences in the input-output efficiency of the new-type R&D institutions in different regions, different attributes and different types of R&D. On the basis of the research results, the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions are put forward to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the follow-up management and high-quality development.

Key words: new R&D institution, data envelopment analysis(DEA), performance evaluation

中图分类号: 

  • G322
[1] 陈宝明, 刘光武, 丁明磊. 我国新型研发组织发展现状与政策建议[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2013(3): 27-31.
CHEN B M, LIU G W, DING M L. Current situation and policy suggestions of new research and development organizations in China [J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2013(3): 27-31.
[2] 张光宇, 李润宜, 刘贻新, 等. 基于“弓弦箭”模型的产业竞争力提升策略研究: 以广州市为例[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2018, 35(6): 1-8,17.
ZHANG G Y, LI R Y, LIU Y X, et al. Aresearch on improvement strategy of Guangzhou industrial competitiveness based on “Bow String Arrow”model [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2018, 35(6): 1-8,17.
[3] 陈雪, 龙云凤. 广东新型研发机构科技成果转化的主要模式及建议[J]. 科技管理研究., 2017, 37(4): 101-105.
CHEN X, LONG Y F. Main modes and suggestions on the transformation of scientific and technological achievements of new R&D institutions in Guangdong [J]. Science and Technology Management Research., 2017, 37(4): 101-105.
[4] 黄水芳, 张光宇. 新型研发机构培育颠覆性技术的机制研究[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2020, 37(2): 22-29.
HUANG S F, ZHANG G Y. A research on difficulties and mechanism of new R&D institutions to cultivate disruptive technologies [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2020, 37(2): 22-29.
[5] 陈红梅. 新型研发机构运行机制研究[D]. 广州: 中共广东省委党校, 2016.
[6] 李金惠, 王静雯, 王増栩. 广东新型研发机构发展现状、政策及建议分析[J]. 技术与创新管理., 2018, 39(3): 267-270.
LI J H, WANG J W, WANG Z X. Analysis on the current situation and policy suggestion of new R&D institutions in Guangdong province [J]. Technology and Innovation Management., 2018, 39(3): 267-270.
[7] 童桦, 唐慧君, 唐晖. 研究型大学科研评价指标体系研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 2005(3): 46-49.
TONG H, TANG H J, TANG H. Research on evaluation index system of scientific research in researchuniversity [J]. Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences), 2005(3): 46-49.
[8] 郭百涛, 王帅斌, 王冀宁, 等. 基于网络层次分析的新型研发机构共建绩效评价体系研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2020, 40(10): 72-79.
GUO B T, WANG S B, WANG J N, et al. Research on evaluation system of new R&D institutions based on network analytic hierarchy process [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2020, 40(10): 72-79.
[9] 江曼琦, 仇什. 国家自主创新示范区规划实施评价指标体系研究——以天津国家自主创新示范区为例[J]. 河北经贸大学学报, 2021, 42(2): 102-108.
JIANG M Q, QIU S. Research onevalution index system of planning implementation of the national independent innovation demonstration zone—taking Tianjin national independent innovation demonstration zone as an example [J]. Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business, 2021, 42(2): 102-108.
[10] 朱熊. 科研院所绩效管理与评价研究[D]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2014.
[11] 孟溦, 宋娇娇. 新型研发机构绩效评估研究——基于资源依赖和社会影响力的双重视角[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(8): 20-31.
MENG W, SONG J J. A study on performance evaluation of new R&D institutions: dual perspective of resource dependence and social influence [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(8): 20-31.
[12] 陈雪, 李炳超, 叶超贤. 广东省新型研发机构竞争力评价指标体系研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(1): 70-76.
CHEN X, LI B C, YE C X. Research on evaluation index system of competitiveness of new R&D institutions in Guangdong Province [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2019, 39(1): 70-76.
[13] 孙雯熙, 陈春, 高峰, 等. 新型研发机构评价研究综述及启示建议-评价流程视角[J]. 科技管理研究, 2020, 40(23): 100-107.
SUN W X, CHEN C, GAO F, et al. Overview of performance evaluation research of China's new R&D institutions: based on the evaluation process [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2020, 40(23): 100-107.
[14] 陈红喜, 姜春, 罗利华, 等. 新型研发机构成果转化扩散绩效评价体系设计[J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(8): 162-171,113.
CHEN H X, JIANG C, LUO L H, et al. The performance evaluation system design of new R&D institutions achievement transformation and diffusion [J]. Journal of Information, 2018, 37(8): 162-171,113.
[15] 王帮俊, 吴艳芳. 区域产学研协同创新绩效评价——基于因子分析的视角[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018, 38(1): 66-71.
WANG B J, WU Y F. The performance evaluation of collaborative innovation among regional industryuniversity and research institutions: from the perspective of factor analysis [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2018, 38(1): 66-71.
[16] 汤静. 基于DEA模型的江苏各区域科研机构绩效评价研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2013.
[17] 李群, 韦海成, 朱立军, 等. 超效率-DEA融合层次分析法在高校实验室建设绩效考核中应用[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2020, 39(12): 233-237,279.
LI Q, WEI H C, ZHU L J, et al. Application of super-DEA fusion analytic hierarchy process in performance evaluation of universitylaboratory construction [J]. Research and Exploration in Laboratory, 2020, 39(12): 233-237,279.
[18] CHARNES A, COOPER W W, SEIFORD L. Extremal principles and optimization dualities for khinchin-kullback-leibler estimation [J]. Optimization, 1978, 9(1): 21-29.
[19] ANDERSON P, PETERSEN N C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis [J]. Management Science, 1993, 39(10): 1179-1297.
[1] 刘贻新, 冯秀山, 罗嘉文, 张光宇. SNM视角下新型研发机构发展质量提升路径与策略[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2020, 37(04): 105-110.
[2] 黄水芳, 张光宇. 新型研发机构培育颠覆性技术的机制研究[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2020, 37(02): 22-29.
[3] 郑奕, 刘贻新, 张光宇. 新型研发机构动态管理的组成机制及提升策略研究:政府视角[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2020, 37(02): 30-38.
[4] 周泽兴, 刘贻新, 张光宇. 法人身份视角下的新型研发机构创新阻碍及对策研究[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2020, 37(01): 95-102.
[5] 刘贻新, 欧春尧, 张光宇, 杨诗炜. 新型研发机构成长路径及其特征:科技创新视角[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2019, 36(05): 94-101,110.
[6] 欧春尧, 刘贻新, 张光宇, 杨诗炜. 面向科技创新的新型研发机构产生背景与现实契机研究[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2019, 36(05): 102-110.
[7] 屈娟娟1 , 张成科2 , 朱怀念1. 基于DEA的广东省科研机构投入产出的效率评价[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2010, 27(4): 50-53.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!