广东工业大学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (06): 85-91.doi: 10.12052/gdutxb.190064

• • 上一篇    下一篇

横观各向同性土体挡土墙被动土压力研究

陈涛, 杨雪强, 刘攀, 郑丽婷, 周若洋   

  1. 广东工业大学 土木与交通工程学院，广东 广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-06 出版日期:2020-11-02 发布日期:2020-11-21
  • 通信作者: 杨雪强(1966-)，男，教授，博士，主要研究方向为岩土本构关系及边坡稳定等，E-mail：xqyfls@126.com E-mail:xqyfls@126.com
  • 作者简介:陈涛(1990-)，男，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为岩土工程检测及数值计算
  • 基金资助:
    中国博士后科学基金资助项目（2017M622635）

Study on Passive Earth Pressure of Retaining Wall in Transversely Isotropic Soil

Chen Tao, Yang Xue-qiang, Liu Pan, Zheng Li-ting, Zhou Ruo-yang   

  1. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • Received:2019-05-06 Online:2020-11-02 Published:2020-11-21

HTML

PDF (PC)

2605

摘要： 大多天然土体具有横观各向同性的特点，在同一个模型中，采用分块处理的方法来讨论横观各向同性土的被动土压力变化；基于最小二乘法原理和组构张量理论，研究位移一次和分步多次施加两种方法，计算土体大主应力方向与沉积面法线方向之间的夹角变化，得到模型分块后各分块新的土体强度参数ci和φi，进而分析各向异性下的被动土压力变化。研究表明：考虑土体横观各向同性后，达到极限平衡时土体经多次位移施加得到的被动土压力比一次位移施加要小，且接近库伦土压力理论解；土体沉积面倾斜对被动土压力的影响要比沉积面水平时引起的影响更为显著；4种屈服准则下得到的被动土压力的差异大小与理论分析相符合。

关键词: 横观各向同性, 被动土压力, 组构张量, 位移施加, 屈服准则

Abstract: Most natural soils have the characteristics of transverse isotropy. Using the method of block processing in the same model to discuss the change of passive earth pressure of transverse isotropic soils, based on the principle of least squares and the theory of fabric tensor, the two methods of one-step and multi-step displacement applications are studied to calculate the angle change between the direction of the major principal stress of the soil and the normal direction of the sedimentary surface. New soil strength parameters ci and φi in each block are obtained, and then the change of passive earth pressure under soil anisotropy is analyzed. When reaching the passive limit equilibrium state in the transverse isotropy soil, the research shows that the passive earth pressure obtained by applying multi-step displacement method, which is close to the theoretical solution of Coulomb's passive soil pressure, is smaller than that of applying one-step displacement method. The change of earth pressure is more significant when the sedimentary surface being oblique than that of the sedimentary surface being horizontal. The differences in passive earth pressures obtained under the four type yield criteria are consistent with theoretical analyses.

Key words: transverse isotropic, passive earth pressure, fabric tensor, displacement application, yield criterion

中图分类号: 

  • TU432
[1] 顾慰慈. 挡土墙土压力计算手册[M]. 北京: 中国建材工业出版社, 2004.
[2] TSAGAELIZ V. Experimental investigation of the pressure of a loose medium on retaining walls with a vertical back face and horizontal backfill surface [J]. Soil Mechanics & Foundation Engineering, 1965, 2(4): 197-200.
[3] FANG Y, ISHIBASHI I. Static earth pressures with various wall movements [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(8): 317-333.
[4] 陈页开. 挡土墙上土压力的试验研究和数值分析[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2001.
[5] 李秀梅, 蒋明镜. 两种位移模式下挡墙主动土压力的离散元模拟[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2010, 6(1): 60-64.
LI X M, JIANG M J. Discrete element simulation of active earth pressure of retaining wall under two displacement modes [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2010, 6(1): 60-64.
[6] TATSUOKA F, SAKAMOTO M, KAWAMURA T, et al. Strengthand deformation characterstics of sand in plane strain compression at extremely low pressures [J]. Soils & Foundations, 2008, 26(1): 65-84.
[7] 曾庆有, 周健. 不同墙体位移方式下被动土压力的颗粒流模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2005(S1): 43-47.
ZENG Q Y, ZHOU J. Particle flow simulation of passive earth pressure under different wall displacement modes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005(S1): 43-47.
[8] 陈页开. 挡土墙上土压力的试验研究与数值分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2002(8): 1275.
CHEN Y K. Experimental study and numerical analysis of earth pressure on retaining wall [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002(8): 1275.
[9] 杨雪强, 李子生, 燕全会, 等. 横观各向同性岩石类材料的破坏准则[J]. 工程力学, 2012, 29(12): 359-333.
YANG X Q, LI Z S, YAN Q H, et al. Failure criterion of transversely isotropic rock materials [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(12): 359-333.
[10] 杨雪强, 张丽娟, 燕全会, 等. 横观各向同性岩石类材料的破坏准则[J]. 应用力学学报, 2013, 30(3): 304-310.
YANG X Q, ZHANG L J, YAN Q H, et al. Failure criterion of transversely isotropic rock materials [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2013, 30(3): 304-310.
[11] 赵伟. 最小二乘法在土体直剪试验中的应用[J]. 武警工程学院学报, 2009(6): 67-68.
ZHAO W. Application of least squares method in direct shear test of Soil [J]. Journal of Armed Police Forces College, 2009(6): 67-68.
[12] 李永刚, 周慧珍. 平移模式挡土墙非极限状态被动土压力有限元分析[J]. 山西水利科技, 2017(4): 1-2.
LI Y G, ZHOU H Z. Finite element analysis of passive earth pressure in non-limit state of translational retaining wall [J]. Shanxi Water Resources Science & Technology, 2017(4): 1-2.
[13] KURUKULASURIYA L C, ODA M, KAZAMA H. Anisotropy of undrained shear strength of an over-consolidated soil by triaxial and plane strain test [J]. Soils and Foundations, 1999, 39(1): 21-29.
[14] 刘亚栋. 考虑土体强度各向异性的边坡稳定性研究[D]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2018.
[15] 徐日庆, 陈页开, 杨仲轩, 龚晓南. 刚性挡墙被动土压力模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2002(5): 569-575.
XU R Q, CHEN Y K, YANG Z X, et al. Experimental study on passive earth pressure model of rigid retaining wall [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002(5): 569-575.
[16] 赵光辉. 某挡土墙土压力有限元分析[J]. 低温建筑技术, 2012, 34(6): 129-130.
ZHAO G H. Finite element analysis of earth pressure on a retaining wall [J]. Cryogenics Technology, 2012, 34(6): 129-130.
[17] 杨雪强, 凌平平, 向胜华. 基于系列Drucker-Prager破坏准则评述土坡的稳定性[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(4): 865-870.
YANG X Q, LING P P, XIANG S H. Study on stability of soil slope based on Drucker-Prager failure criterion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(4): 865-870.
[1] 刘亚栋, 杨雪强, 徐雷, 林耀康, 龚星. 考虑土体强度各向异性的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2018, 35(06): 57-62.
[2] 杨雪强1，陈晓平2，宫全美3，孙汉芳1. 砂土的剪胀方程及其塑性势(Ⅱ): 新的拓展[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2012, 29(2): 38-44.
[3] 杨雪强1 , 吴子超2 , 杨宗轲3. 框架——片筏——地基共同作用的三维有限元分析研究[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2010, 27(4): 9-15.
[4] 杨雪强； 凌平平； 杨锐； 陈桂林； . 坡顶局部荷载下边坡的二维和三维稳定分析(Ⅰ)——强度折减的有限元法[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2008, 25(4): 86-93.
[5] 杨雪强； 张建龙； 刘勇健； . 修正Cam模型与Lade-Duncan屈服准则的合理耦合[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2008, 25(3): 90-94.
[6] 黄小华； 程雪梅； . 一种松质骨微结构图像分析的新方法及其应用[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2006, 23(4): 27-30.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2017 《广东工业大学学报》编辑部
地址：广州市东风东路729号广东工业大学 邮编：510090
电话：020-37626653,020-37626139,020-37626396
邮箱：xbzrb@gdut.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发