Journal of Guangdong University of Technology ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (02): 73-82.doi: 10.12052/gdutxb.200118

• Comprehensive Studies • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Progress on Bone Graft PEEK about Surface Modification

Xiao Tian-hua1,2, Liu Rong-tao1, Pang Yin-yu1, Li Da1, Liu Jia1, Min Yong-gang1,2   

  1. 1. School of Materials and Energy, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China;
    2. Dongguan South China Design and Innovation Institute, Dongguan 523808, China
  • Received:2020-09-11 Online:2021-03-10 Published:2021-01-13

Abstract: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a class of semi-crystalline polymer. Compared with traditional bone repair materials, PEEK possesses good biocompatibility, chemical stability, light transmittance and elastic modulus which is similar to that of normal human bone. Therefore it has been widely used in transplantation. However, the biological inertia of PEEK limits its clinical application. At now, the surface modification is an effective way to solve this problem. The current status of research and direction of development about PEEK surface modification methods in recent years are reviewed. And physical modification, chemical modification and coating modification are emphasized. The effects of different modification technologies on improving biocompatibility were analyzed. Finally, the problems are pointed out that need to be solved for PEEK surface modified bone graft material to continue to develop in the medical field. The body's reaction must be studied fully at every stage after the bone graft material was implanted in the body. And it is ensured that the surface treatment does not degrade or wear away normal tissues throughout the whole life cycle.

Key words: polyetheretherketone, surface modification, bioactivity, bone integration, antibacterial

CLC Number: 

  • R318.08
[1] BUCK E, LI H, CERRUTI M. Surface modification strategies to improve the osseointegration of poly(etheretherketone) and its composites [J]. Macromolecular Bioscience, 2019, 20(2): 1900271.
[2] MISHRA S, CHOWDHARY R. PEEK materials as an alternative to titanium in dental implants: a systematic review [J]. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2019, 21(1): 208-222.
[3] KURTZ S M, DEVINE J N. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants [J]. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(32): 4845-4869.
[4] PARK H, LEE J, MOON S, et al. The efficacy of the synthetic interbody cage and grafton for anterior cervical fusion [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2009, 34(17): E591-E595.
[5] KOH Y, PARK K, LEE J, et al. Total knee arthroplasty application of polyetheretherketone and carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone: a review [J]. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2019, 100: 70-81.
[6] TOTH J M, WANG M, ESTES B T, et al. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications [J]. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(3): 324-334.
[7] LU T, WEN J, QIAN S, et al. Enhanced osteointegration on tantalum-implanted polyetheretherketone surface with bone-like elastic modulus [J]. Biomaterials, 2015, 51: 173-183.
[8] CHEN M, OUYANG L, LU T, et al. Enhanced bioactivity and bacteriostasis of surface fluorinated polyetheretherketone [J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(20): 16824-16833.
[9] WEN J, LU T, WANG X, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of silicate-coated polyetheretherketone fabricated by electron beam evaporation [J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(21): 13197-13206.
[10] ALOTAIBI N, NAUDI K, CONWAY D, et al. The current state of PEEK implant osseointegration and future perspectives: a systematic review [J]. European Cells and Materials, 2020, 40: 1-20.
[11] MA R, TANG T. Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK [J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2014, 15(4): 5426-5445.
[12] BRIEM D, STRAMETZ S, SCHRÖODER K, et al. Response of primary fibroblasts and osteoblasts to plasma treated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surfaces [J]. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2005, 16(7): 671-677.
[13] HA S W, KIRCH M, BIRCHLER F, et al. Surface activation of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and formation of calcium phosphate coatings by precipitation [J]. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 1997, 8(11): 683-690.
[14] AWAJA F, ZHANG S, JAMES N, et al. Enhanced autohesive bonding of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for biomedical applications using a methane/oxygen plasma treatment [J]. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 2010, 7(12): 1010-1021.
[15] AWAJA F, BAX D V, ZHANG S, et al. Cell adhesion to PEEK treated by plasma immersion ion implantation and deposition for active medical implants [J]. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 2012, 9(4): 355-362.
[16] WASER-ALTHAUS J, SALAMON A, WASER M, et al. Differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on plasma-treated polyetheretherketone [J]. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2014, 25(2): 515-525.
[17] YU X, IBRAHIM M, LIU Z, et al. Biofunctional Mg coating on PEEK for improving bioactivity [J]. Bioactive Materials, 2018, 3(2): 139-143.
[18] KRATOCHVÍL J, ŠTĚRBA J, LIESKOVSKÁ J, et al. Antibacterial effect of Cu/C:F nanocomposites deposited on PEEK substrates [J]. Materials Letters, 2018, 230: 96-99.
[19] HUANG R Y M, SHAO P, BURNS C M, et al. Sulfonation of poly(ether ether ketone)(PEEK): kinetic study and characterization [J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2001, 82(11): 2651-2660.
[20] ZHAO Y, WONG H M, WANG W, et al. Cytocompatibility, osseointegration, and bioactivity of three-dimensional porous and nanostructured network on polyetheretherketone [J]. Biomaterials, 2013, 34(37): 9264-9277.
[21] OUYANG L, ZHAO Y, JIN G, et al. Influence of sulfur content on bone formation and antibacterial ability of sulfonated PEEK [J]. Biomaterials, 2016, 83: 115-126.
[22] ZHENG Y, LIU L, XIAO L, et al. Enhanced osteogenic activity of phosphorylated polyetheretherketone via surface-initiated grafting polymerization of vinylphosphonic acid [J]. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2019, 173: 591-598.
[23] FRISTRUP C J, JANKOVA K, HVILSTED S. Hydrophilization of poly(ether ether ketone) films by surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization [J]. Polymer Chemistry, 2010, 1(10): 1696.
[24] SUN Z, OUYANG L, MA X, et al. Controllable and durable release of BMP-2-loaded 3D porous sulfonated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for osteogenic activity enhancement [J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2018, 171: 668-674.
[25] SHAH N J, HYDER M N, MOSKOWITZ J S, et al. Surface-mediated bone tissue morphogenesis from tunable nanolayered implant coatings [J]. Sci Transl Med, 2013, 5(191): 183r-191r.
[26] SADAT-SHOJAI M, KHORASANI M, DINPANAH-KHOSHDARGI E, et al. Synthesis methods for nanosized hydroxyapatite with diverse structures [J]. Acta Biomaterialia, 2013, 9(8): 7591-7621.
[27] LEE J H, JANG H L, LEE K M, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the bioactivity of hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone biocomposites created by cold spray technology [J]. Acta Biomaterialia, 2013, 9(4): 6177-6187.
[28] DONG T, DUAN C, WANG S, et al. Multifunctional surface with enhanced angiogenesis for improving long-term osteogenic fixation of poly(ether ether ketone) implants [J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 12(13): 14971-14982.
[29] QIU J, GENG H, WANG D, et al. Layer-number dependent antibacterial and osteogenic behaviors of graphene oxide electrophoretic deposited on titanium [J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(14): 12253-12263.
[30] YAN J, WANG C, LI K, et al. Enhancement of surface bioactivity on carbon fiber-reinforced polyether ether ketone via graphene modification [J]. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2018, 13: 3425-3440.
[31] OUYANG L, DENG Y, YANG L, et al. Graphene-oxide-decorated microporous polyetheretherketone with superior antibacterial capability and in vitro osteogenesis for orthopedic implant [J]. Macromolecular Bioscience, 2018, 18(6): 1800036.
[32] OUYANG L, QI M, WANG S, et al. Osteogenesis and antibacterial activity of graphene oxide and dexamethasone coatings on porous polyetheretherketone via polydopamine-assisted chemistry [J]. Coatings, 2018, 8(6): 203.
[33] KWON G, KIM H, GUPTA K C, et al. Enhanced tissue compatibility of polyetheretherketone disks by dopamine-mediated protein immobilization [J]. Macromolecular Research, 2018, 26(2): 128-138.
[34] XU X, LI Y, WANG L, et al. Triple-functional polyetheretherketone surface with enhanced bacteriostasis and anti-inflammatory and osseointegrative properties for implant application [J]. Biomaterials, 2019, 212: 98-114.
[35] ZHU Y, CAO Z, PENG Y, et al. Facile surface modification method for synergistically enhancing the biocompatibility and bioactivity of poly(ether ether ketone) that induced osteodifferentiation [J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(31): 27503-27511.
[36] ZHANG J, CAI L, WANG T, et al. Lithium doped silica nanospheres/poly(dopamine) composite coating on polyetheretherketone to stimulate cell responses, improve bone formation and osseointegration [J]. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 2018, 14(3): 965-976.
[37] LU T, LIU X, QIAN S, et al. Multilevel surface engineering of nanostructured TiO2 on carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone [J]. Biomaterials, 2014, 35(22): 5731-5740.
[38] WANG X, LU T, WEN J, et al. Selective responses of human gingival fibroblasts and bacteria on carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone with multilevel nanostructured TiO2 [J]. Biomaterials, 2016, 83: 207-218.
[39] WANG H, LU T, MENG F, et al. Enhanced osteoblast responses to poly ether ether ketone surface modified by water plasma immersion ion implantation [J]. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2014, 117: 89-97.
[40] LU T, LI J, QIAN S, et al. Enhanced osteogenic and selective antibacterial activities on micro-/nano-structured carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2016, 4(17): 2944-2953.
[41] LU T, QIAN S, MENG F, et al. Enhanced osteogenic activity of poly ether ether ketone using calcium plasma immersion ion implantation [J]. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2016, 142: 192-198.
[42] GAN K, LIU H, JIANG L, et al. Bioactivity and antibacterial effect of nitrogen plasma immersion ion implantation on polyetheretherketone [J]. Dental Materials, 2016, 32(11): e263-e274.
[43] WYSZOGRODZKA G, MARSZALEK B, GIL B, et al. Metal-organic frameworks: mechanisms of antibacterial action and potential applications [J]. Drug Discov Today, 2016, 21(6): 1009-1018.
[44] LIU X, GAN K, LIU H, et al. Antibacterial properties of nano-silver coated PEEK prepared through magnetron sputtering [J]. Dental Materials, 2017, 33(9): e348-e360.
[45] LIU W, LI J, CHENG M, et al. A surface-engineered polyetheretherketone biomaterial implant with direct and immunoregulatory antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus [J]. Biomaterials, 2019, 208: 8-20.
[1] ZHANG Ran, LIANG Liang, WAN Yan, HU Long. Study of Nano-silver Waterborne Antibacterial Wood Coatings [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2015, 32(04): 40-45.
[2] ZHENG Zheng-Nan, TAN Jun-Jie, WU Shuai, DING Li-Jun, ZHENG Xi. Antimicrobial Activity of Tannic Acid in Vitro and Its Influencing Factors [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2015, 32(04): 46-51.
[3] Zhang Min, Han Yali. Extraction of Total Falconoids from Mikania Micrantha and Study of  Antibacterial Activities [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2014, 31(2): 133-138.
[4] DAI Chun-Ying, TAN Zhu-Jun, LI Zi-Wei. A Study of Antibacterial Activity of Haemolymph from Eupolyphage by Inducement [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2014, 31(1): 136-140.
[5] YUAN Zi-Long 1, ZHANG Wei1, ZHAO Wei-Ren1, TANG Lu-Xin2, SHENG Xia1,XIE Min-Qiang-3. Thermo-magnetic Stability of Ferrofluid for Hyperthermia [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2011, 28(3): 62-65.
[6] WU Li-Huan, DENG Qi, ZHOU Qiu-Gu. Antibacterial Activity of Novel Quinoline Derivatives Containing Piperazine [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2010, 27(2): 40-42.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!