Journal of Guangdong University of Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (01): 39-49.doi: 10.12052/gdutxb.220125

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Enhancing Digital Innovation: the Effects of CIO Political Skill and the Mediating Role of Issue Selling

Zhang Yan-lin, Deng Fu-xiang, Tang Hong-ting, Wu Xue-yan   

  1. School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
  • Received:2022-07-28 Online:2023-01-25 Published:2023-01-12

HTML

PDF (PC)

1671

Abstract: Although the Chief Information Officers (CIOs) have the important responsibility for digital innovation in their organizations, it is difficult for them to meet the challenges of the organizational changes involved in relying on traditional structural power and expert roles. Drawing on political skill and issue selling theory, a study is conducted to explore how CIOs can use political skills to drive digital innovation. A theoretical model is presented and empirically tested using survey data collected from a sample of 218 matched pairs of CIOs and top business executives through multilevel regression analysis. The results suggest that: CIO political skill positively affects CIO issue selling effectiveness, which in turn positively affects enterprises digital innovation. CIO issue selling effectiveness fully mediates the positive effect of CIO political skills on enterprises digital innovation. Socio-behavioral integration between business executives positively moderates the relationship between CIO issue selling effectiveness and digital innovation. Accordingly, it is concluded that CIO political skills and issue selling effectiveness are enablers for digital innovation, and that CIO issue selling effectiveness and business executive socio-behavioral integration play a mediating and moderating effect, respectively. The research model proposed and empirically tested in this study bridges the research gap in CIOs effectively driving enterprises' digital innovation and can then provide some practical guidance.

Key words: digital innovation, Chief Information Officer(CIO), political skill, issue selling, socio-behavioral integration

CLC Number: 

  • C931.6
[1] 张延林, 邓福祥, 唐洪婷. CIO自身技能、需求方领导力与数字化创新[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(11): 145-156.
ZHANG Y L, DENG F X, TANG H T. Effects of CIO skills and demand-side leadership on digital innovation [J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(11): 145-156.
[2] CHEN D Q, ZHANG Y, XIAO J, et al. Making digital innovation happen: a chief information officer issue selling perspective [J]. Information Systems Research, 2021, 32(3): 987-1008.
[3] CHEN D Q, ZHANG Y, XIE K, et al. Shaping an innovative information system strategy: a CIO issue selling perspective[C]//International Conference on Information Systems 2017. Seoul: Association for Information Systems, 2017: 1-14.
[4] SINGH A, HESS T. How chief digital officers promote the digital transformation of their companies [J]. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2017, 16(1): 1-17.
[5] 白海青, 成瑾, 毛基业. CEO如何支持CIO?——基于结构性权力视角的多案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2014(7): 107-118.
BAI H Q, CHENG J, MAO J Y. How does CEO support CIO?—A multi-case study based on a structural power perspective [J]. Management World, 2014(7): 107-118.
[6] JONES M C, KAPPELMAN L, PAVUR R, et al. Pathways to being CIO: the role of background revisited [J]. Information & Management, 2020, 57(5): 103234.
[7] BANKER R D, HU N, PAVLOU P A, et al. CIO reporting structure, strategic positioning, and firm performance [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2011, 32(2): 487-504.
[8] GONZALEZ P A, ASHWORTH L, MCKEEN J. The CIO stereotype: content, bias, and impact [J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2019, 28(1): 83-99.
[9] HININGS B, GEGENHUBER T, GREENWOOD R. Digital innovation and transformation: an institutional perspective [J]. Information and Organization, 2018, 28(1): 52-61.
[10] LOKUGE S, SEDERA D, GROVER V, et al. Organizational readiness for digital innovation: development and empirical calibration of a construct [J]. Information & Management, 2019, 56(3): 445-461.
[11] TUMBAS S, BERENTE N, BROCKE J V. Digital innovation and institutional entrepreneurship: chief digital officer perspectives of their emerging role [J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2018, 33(3): 188-202.
[12] STEIBER A, ALÄNGE S, GHOSH S, et al. Digital transformation of industrial firms: an innovation diffusion perspective [J]. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2020, 24(3): 799-819.
[13] MINTZBERG H. The organization as political arena [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 1985, 22(2): 133-154.
[14] PFEFFER J. Power play [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2010, 88(7/8): 84-92.
[15] EWEN C, WIHLER A, BLICKLE G, et al. Further specification of the leader political skill–leadership effectiveness relationships: transformational and transactional leader behavior as mediators [J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2013, 24(4): 516-533.
[16] GEROW J E, GROVER V, THATCHER J B. Can political skill enhance business and IT knowledge? [J]. Information Systems Management, 2017, 34(2): 157-171.
[17] FERRIS G R, TREADWAY D C, KOLODINSKY R W, et al. Development and validation of the political skill inventory [J]. Journal of Management, 2005, 31(1): 126-152.
[18] DUTTON J E, ASHFORD S J. Selling issues to top management [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1993, 18(3): 397-428.
[19] CHEN M J, LIN H C, MICHEL J G. Navigating in a hypercompetitive environment: the roles of action aggressiveness and TMT integration [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(13): 1410-1430.
[20] PFEFFER J. Power in organizations[M]. Boston: Pitman Ballinger Pub Co, 1981.
[21] VAN DE VEN A H. Running in packs to develop knowledge-intensive technologies [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2005, 29(2): 365-377.
[22] FERRIS G R, ELLEN III B P, MCALLISTER C P, et al. Reorganizing organizational politics research: a review of the literature and identification of future research directions [J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2019, 6: 299-323.
[23] BROUER R L, CHIU C C, WANG L. Political skill dimensions and transformational leadership in China [J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2016, 6(31): 1040-1056.
[24] DUTTON J E, ASHFORD S J, ONEILL R M, et al. Reading the wind: how middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(5): 407-423.
[25] HOWARD-GRENVILLE J A. Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: issue selling as resourcing [J]. Organization Science, 2007, 18(4): 560-577.
[26] ASHFORD S J, ROTHBARD N P, PIDERIT S K, et al. Out on a limb: the role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43(1): 23-57.
[27] ALT E, CRAIG J B. Selling issues with solutions: igniting social entrepreneurship in for-profit organizations [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2016, 53(5): 794-820.
[28] ENNS H G, HUFF S L, HIGGINS C A. CIO lateral influence behaviors: gaining peers' commitment to strategic information systems [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2003, 27(1): 155-176.
[29] 张延林, 王丽, 谢康, 等. 信息技术和实体经济深度融合: 中国情境的拼创机制[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020(11): 80-98.
ZHANG Y L, WANG L, XIE K, et al. Integrating information technology and the real economy: a bricolage perspective in the Chinese context [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2020(11): 80-98.
[30] KARAHANNA E, PRESTON D S. The effect of social capital of the relationship between the CIO and top management team on firm performance [J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2013, 30(1): 15-56.
[31] VIAL G. Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda [J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2019, 28(2): 118-144.
[32] OCASIO W, LAAMANEN T, VAARA E. Communication and attention dynamics: an attention-based view of strategic change [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(1): 155-167.
[33] 邓春平, 宋琦, 毛基业, 等. 发起与感知: 协同创新中议题营销的作用[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(12): 95-110.
DENG C P, SONG Q, MAO J Y, et al. Initiation and perception: the role of issue selling in collaborative innovation [J]. Management World, 2018, 34(12): 95-110.
[34] SVAHN F, MATHIASSEN L, LINDGREN R. Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: how volvo cars managed competing concerns [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 239-253.
[35] NAMBISAN S, LYYTINEN K, MAJCHRZAK A, et al. Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 223-238.
[36] ZHANG Y, LI H. Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: the role of ties with service intermediaries [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(1): 88-109.
[37] FRANK K A, MAROULIS S J, DUONG M Q, et al. What would it take to change an inference? Using Rubin's causal model to interpret the robustness of causal inferences [J]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2013, 35(4): 437-460.
[1] Du Helen S., Luo Zi-chan, Chen Yang-sen. Value Co-creation Based on Social Network Analysis and Counterfactual Analysis: Taking Xiaomi Virtual Community as an Example [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2020, 37(02): 11-21.
[2] He Wei-jun, Zhou Ying-tang. A Social Network Recommendation Algorithm Combining Strong and Weak Ties and Interests [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2019, 36(03): 39-46.
[3] Du Helen S., Jiang Rui-xin, Zhu Lin. A Study of Enterprise WeChat Popularity and Service Quality: Cases from Logistics Firms [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2019, 36(01): 29-34,50.
[4] Du Helen S, Ke Xiao-bo, Yi Hu, Hu Shao-ru. A Review of Social Media Popularity Studies: A Technology Dependent and Social Construction Perspective [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2017, 34(04): 1-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Guangdong University of Technology
Add：729 East Dongfeng RD., Guangzhou PRC. Postcode: 510090
Tel：020-37626653,020-37626139,020-37626396
Email：xbzrb@gdut.edu.cn
Supported:Beijing Magtech