基于改进TOPSIS的城市土地综合效益评价及障碍因子诊断

doi:10.12052/gdutxb.160132

Abstract

Abstract: Evaluation of urban land use comprehensive benefit and diagnosis of its obstacle indicators would be greatly helpful for sustainable land use. A concept of urban land use comprehensive benefit is introduced and a theoretical model established to assess the land comprehensive benefit. The evaluation index system is built with the indices of economic benefits, social benefits and environmental benefits, with TOPSIS method and obstacle degree model used. Results show (1) that the degree of land comprehensive benefit generally experiences four development processes from low performance, medium, good to superior and (2) that the obstacle degree of land economic benefits is maximum, such as average revenue (C2), and the average social commodity sales (C9). After 2012, the obstacle degree of social benefits and environmental benefits of land was maximum; and (3) that in the long run, the effect of social benefit and ecological environment benefit on land comprehensive benefit is increasing continuously.

Key words: urban land comprehensive benefit, improved TOPSIS method, obstacle degree, Guangzhou

CLC Number:

293.2

Li Feng-chun, Zhou Wei-ji, Huang Shi-qi. A Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Urban Land Based on the Improved TOPSIS Method and Diagnosis of Its Obstacle Indicators[J].Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2017, 34(05): 45-51.

References 17

[1] 黄奕龙, 王仰麟, 卜新国, 等. 城市土地利用综合效益评价:城际比较[J]. 热带地理, 2006, 26(2):145-151.HUANG Y L, WANG Y L, BU X G, et al. Assessment of the land use benefits in a city scale:a case study of Shenzhen[J]. Tropical Geography, 2006, 26(2):145-151. [2] 李灿, 张凤荣, 朱泰峰, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用绩效评价及关联分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(5):217-227.LI C, ZHANG F R, ZHU T F, et al. Evaluation and correlation analysis of land use performance based on entropy-weight TOPSIS method[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2013, 29(5):217-227. [3] 李明月, 江华. 广州市土地利用效益评价[J]. 广东土地科学, 2005, 4(3):35-37.LI M Y, JIANG H. The evaluation of land using effect in Guangzhou[J]. Guangdong Tu Di Ke Xue, 2005, 4(3):35-37. [4] 李穗浓. 基于城镇化视角的乡村土地利用效益评价及调控机制研究-以广州市白云区118个行政村为例[D]. 北京:中国地质大学土地科学技术学院, 2014. [5] 鲁春阳, 文枫, 杨庆媛, 等. 基于改进TOPSIS法的城市土地利用绩效评价及障碍因子诊断:以重庆市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2011, 33(3):535-541.LU C Y, WEN F, YANG Q Y, et al. An evaluation of urban land use performance based on the improved topsis method and diagnosis of its obstacle indicators:a case study of Chongqing[J]. Resources Science, 2011, 33(3):535-541. [6] 张嘉宁, 王继军. 黄土高原沟壑区王东沟流域土地利用效益评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2009, 16(2):142-146.ZHANG J N, WANG J J. Benefit assessment of land use of Wangdonggou watershed in Loess Plateau hilly and gully region[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 16(2):142-146. [7] 周磊, 黄秋昊. 基于灰色关联TOPSIS的城市土地效益评价及障碍因子诊断[J]. 水土保持研究, 2014, 21(4):39-44.ZHOU L, HUANG Q H. Efficiency evaluation on urban land use based on the gray correlation TOPSIS method and diagnosis of its obstacle indicators[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 21(4):39-44. [8] 岳永胜. 陕西省城市用地效益评价研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学经济管理学院, 2010. [9] 王伟娜, 宋戈, 孙丽娜. 哈尔滨市土地利用效益耦合关系研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2012, 19(2):116-120.WANG W N, SONG G, SUN L N. Study on coupling relationship between land use benefits of Harbin city[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 19(2):116-120. [10] 王良健, 韩向华, 李辉罗, 等. 土地供应绩效评估及影响因素的实证研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(10):121-128.WANG L J, HAN X H, LI H L, et al. Empirical study of the influential factors and performance evaluation of land supply[J]. China Population, Resources And Environment, 2014, 24(10):121-128. [11] 胡永宏. 对TOPSIS法用于综合评价的改进[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2002, 32(4):572-575.HU Y H. The improved method for TOPSIS in comprehensive evaluation[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2002, 32(4):572-575. [12] 叶正伟, 孙艳丽. 基于AHP-Topsis的南通市环境灾害风险评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2013, 20(10):121-128.YE Z W, SUN Y L. Risk assessment on environmental disaster in Nantong city based on AHP-Topsis method[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 20(10):121-128. [13] 邱根胜, 邹水木, 刘日华. 多指标决策TOPSIS法的一种改进[J]. 南昌航空工业学院学报(自然科学版), 2005, 19(3):1-4.QIU G S, ZOU S M, LIU R H. Improvement of the TOPSIS for multiple criteria decision making[J]. Journal of Nanchang Institute of Aeronautical Technology (Natural Science), 2005, 19(3):1-4. [14] 李春燕, 南灵. 陕西省土地生态安全动态评价及障碍因子诊断[J]. 中国土地科学, 2015, 4(29):72-80.LI C Y, NAN L. Dynamic evaluation and diagnosis of obstacle factors on land eco-security in Shaanxi province[J]. China Land Sciences, 2015, 4(29):72-80. [15] 王雨晴, 宋戈. 城市土地利用综合效益评价与案例研究[J]. 地理科学, 2006, 26(6):743-748.WANG Y Q, SONG G. The benefits evaluation method and application of urban land use[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2006, 26(6):743-748. [16] 朱士鹏, 徐兵, 毛蒋兴. 城市生态系统健康及其障碍度评价:以南宁市为例[J]. 安徽大学学报:自然科学版, 2015, 39(3):96-102.ZHU S P, XU B, MAO J X. The evaluation on urban ecosystem health and its obstacle degree a case study on Nanning city[J]. Journal of Anhui University(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 39(3):96-102. [17] 雷勋平, Robin Qin, 刘勇. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的区域土地利用绩效评价及障碍因子诊断:[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(13):243-244.LEI X P, ROBIN QIN, LIU Y. Evaluation of regional land use performance based on entropy TOPSIS model and diagnosis of its obstacle factors[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(13):243-244.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

A Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Urban Land Based on the Improved TOPSIS Method and Diagnosis of Its Obstacle Indicators

HTML

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 17

Related Articles 5

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Chen Bing-jie, Chen Pei-min, Huang Ze-peng, Ng Alex Hay-Man, Wang Hua. A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Heat Island Effect in Guangzhou Based on Landsat [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2021, 38(02): 53-59.
[2]	Liang Shi-hua, Zhou Jin-cheng, Luo Qi, Lin Huan-sheng. An Experimental Research on the Effect of Organic Matter on Mechanical Properties of Cementing Solidified Silt [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2019, 36(06): 86-91.
[3]	LIANG Shi-Hua, ZHOU Shi-Zong, ZHANG Lang, WANG Meng. Statistical Analysis of Physical and Mechanical Indexes of Granite Residual Soil in Eastern Guangzhou [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2015, 32(1): 29-33.
[4]	LV Feng-Qin , YUAN Qi-Feng, CHEN Shi-Dong. Research on Spatial Distribution of Rural Co-operative Financing Housing and the Factors in Guangzhou：Based on GIS Spatial Analysis and SPSS Quantitative Statistics [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2015, 32(04): 8-16.
[5]	ZHU Huo-bao,ZHOU Xiang,WANG Li-shan,WANG Yu,ZHANG Jun-jie . Exploration of the Theory of "Organic Centralization"of Small Town Construction in Guangzhou [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2005, 22(4): 83-88.